Kevin Flores

Product Manager, UI/UX Consultant // working on mobile photo + social network projects // info-fiend who strives to know a little something about everything

Ev Williams says Medium aims to flip content publishing upside down

Like many in the tech startup space, I was anxious to see what Medium was all about. It debuted mysteriously with a very simple home page containing only a full screen background image and an email sign up box.  Now, you can read more on its lofty goals as a new publishing platform.

Many originally speculated that it would be an enhanced image service complementing Twitter.  No surprise given Medium is developed by the same team that brought us Twitter - Obvious Corporation, including Ev Williams and Biz Stone.

Recently, I had the fortunate opportunity to hear Ev Williams speak about Medium at a ZURB. This is the most insight to-date that has been shared about the platform’s re-imagined publishing goals.

Here are a few of Williams’ key points about the current state of content publishing:

  • It’s great that everyone has a voice, but people can’t listen to everything – how do we help them listen to the right thing?
  • Social media has made everyone have to be clever and encourages quantity over quality
  • We’re getting shallower content because we are focused on the wrong metrics such as page views

Williams said that it was “the right time to re-apply what we [the content publishing industry] have learned about content creation: technology, infrastructure and distribution”.  He then shared thoughts on how Medium hopes to challenge the status quo:

  • We provide thematic context; people that arrive at a Collection on Medium will likely be more focused and engaged; (eventually), some Collections will be open to all contributors
  • Simplified process – both for writers and readers; clean interface  = focused experience
  • Emphasize quality over most everything else; feedback loops are good, but it’s important to let good quality really shine
  • De-emphasize authorship – help readers focus less on the “celebrity-ness” of an author and more on the quality of the content
  • Medium could be a good place for the casual writer or a current blogger who wants to share something that doesn’t quite fit on their professional blog

Medium has undergone what could arguably be misplaced criticism – that it’s among a crop of new platforms that cater to or are only open to the technology or pop culture elite.  In this case, it is because publishing on Medium is still closed to a network of “invited friends and family”.  However, anyone can log in with their Twitter credentials, browse and even vote on posts.

Medium does have a user rating system that’s slightly less generic than “like”.  They hope users will click based on the quality or relevance and that it will help the best content rise to the top.

On the topic of when the publishing tools will be rolled out to the full public, Williams says that Medium is still finding its way, growing slowly and reacting to how people are using it.  They don’t want to have too many users [content creators] that may be jostled if Medium makes any big changes. He also recently expanded upon this on a Branch thread.

I, for one, will be excitedly keeping up with how Medium evolves.  We’ll see something soon, I suspect – given more feature hints can be found on the simple Profile Settings screen…

If you are interested in learning more about Medium, I suggest that you read the Welcome to Medium post or listen to the Ev Williams lecture from the ZURBsoapbox.

Thanks again to ZURB for their ZURBsoapbox series, where they bring amazing industry speakers down to the non-San Francisco end of Silicon Valley!

LEGO Turing Machine – A working computer made from Mindstorms

Two things I love – computers and LEGOs.  If only I had the time on my hands that Dutch researchers Jeroen van den Bosand and Davy landman did.  Their creation of a Turing Machine – a working computer, built from a single LEGO Mindstorms NXT set  is just plain cool.

Alan Turing was an English mathematician, logician, cryptanalyst and computer scientist whose Turing Machine was a theoretical mechanical computation machine.

When I think of Turing, I just as often recall the Turing Test which he introduced in his 1950 paper “Computing Machinery and Intelligence,” which opens with the words: “I propose to consider the question, ‘Can machines think?’”  Yep, the guy was also an early theoretician on artificial intelligence.

The robots ARE COMING, people.

LEGO Turing Machine from ecalpemos on Vimeo.

via Engaget and PSFK.

Innovate or be Disrupted

I’ve never shopped around for thermostats, nor do I know anyone else who has. However it sure seems that if there was previously a “must-have” thermostat out there, it would have made news before Nest Labs launched their product, the Nest Learning Thermostat, a few months ago.

If you didn’t know, the Co-Founders of Nest Labs previously worked at Apple on the iPod and iPhone. They’ve stated that their experience has shown that every detail matters – physical design, user interface, usability, packaging and marketing.

Their product is elegant, functional and has a purpose to help people save money.

Over a week ago, I read that Honeywell International is suing Nest Labs for infringement of seven thermostat tech patents. I haven’t been able to stop thinking about it.

Now, of course, I think companies have a right to defend their patents. But all of the infringement lawsuits going on between big companies are just sad (Apple, Samsung, Microsoft, Google… the list goes on). It’s a patent arms race to see who can stockpile the most.

The situation between Honeywell and Nest Labs is slightly different. Honeywell International has been around since 1906 and Nest Labs is a startup. It’s probably very difficult to consider oneself an “inventor” these days, but that is kind of what startups are.

Invention today is often tackling new problems or re-inventing the products and industries that are stagnant. That is what Nest Labs has done. They identified a stale product and completely re-defined it. Except for the most discerning, I suspect homeowners could care less about thermostats, or in the least only think about how distracting they look on their walls.

Although the latest Honeywell model does have some modern technology, it just doesn’t have the elegance of the Nest Thermostat. Honeywell had plenty of time to innovate, but didn’t. They didn’t design from a fresh perspective, only an incremental one.

Nest Labs has provided an option to have an eye-catching piece of gadgetry that supports an “eco-friendy” lifestyle and just might save some cash on the energy bill. Even with the question of “Did we need a new thermostat?” the Nest Learning Thermostat is the type of product that the gadget-minded wants to have.

Similarly, the Apple iPod wasn’t the first portable digital music player when it was released in 2001. I had previously owned a Diamond Rio PMP300 MP3 player around 1998. It was a piece of plastic junk that held about 12 MP3s. It and every other portable music player was left behind after the iPod launch. Everyone just wanted one, including me, even if it had less features.

The catchy term in Silicon Valley for re-invention is “disruption“. Startups often aim to disrupt a product or service that is tired. Bonus points if the objective is to do one thing and do it well.

What Nest Labs has done should be seen as an inspiration – not just for independent inventors, but all companies and industries that are complacent with their products and services, those that take no risks. This is your wake up call to innovate.

Nest Lab’s position that Honeywell’s lawsuit is simply a strategy to stifle competition comes as no surprise and I hope that they prevail. I know I’ve been jonesing for their product since its introduction — now I just have to order one.

Update 04.12.12: Nice! Nest Labs Hires Apple’s Former Patent Chief for Honeywell Lawsuit.

Dieter Rams weighs in on THE BLACK CUBE – a “Perfect” Product

I heard that a Dieter Rams exhibit recently opened at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (SFMOMA). I was happy to discover that the exhibit, titled “LESS AND MORE – The Design Ethos of Dieter Rams“, runs until February 2012. Phew, now I just have to remember to go!

In looking around for info, I ran across an interesting post over at Swiss Miss and followed the trail to THE BLACK CUBE project.  The project looks to have been an interesting study by a group of designers to create the “perfect product”. They invited other designers and artists to participate and/or provide comment.

Below is a video of Dieter Rams weighing in. He opens with the proclamation that “The term ‘design’ is worn out and has lost its attraction.” He offers up some opinion on ‘The Black Cube’ briefly making reference to his 10 design principles, which I wrote about last year when the topic of comparing Apple Sr. VP of Industrial Design Jonathan Ive‘s work to that of Dieter Rams was all the rage.

But I digress.

Rams concludes his thoughts on design impact with a question: “Do we have a chance to improve the world, to make it more humane, to make it more ethical? We do!

CUBE Dieter Rams (www.the-black-cube.com) from Andreas Unteidig on Vimeo.

The Story Of Eames Furniture – Interview with Marilyn and John Neuhart

The Story of Eames Furniture: Marilyn Neuhart with John Neuhart – Interview from Gestalten on Vimeo.

Not sure how I missed this exclusive interview with Marilyn Neuhart, author of “The Story of Eames Furniture“, and her husband John. It’s an amazing invitation to their close experience working in the Eames office for nearly 30 years, closely with Charles and Ray Eames.

Someday, I’ll get my dream chair, the Eames Lounge Chair, check out the attention to detail and reverence in manufacturing this classic piece of furniture.